Archive for the ‘ISP – Broadband’ Category

NBN – National Broadband Network gets the go ahead

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

by Matt O’Sullivan

The Federal Government and private sector will invest up to $43 billion over eight years in a super-fast national broadband network, in the ”single biggest infrastructure decision in Australia’s history”.

In a bombshell decision this morning, the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, announced that none of five bidders for the national network – including Optus and Melbourne group Acacia – were up to scratch.

Under the new plans, the funding for the network offering speeds of up to 100 megabits per second will be provided by a national broadband network corporation in which the Government will be the majority shareholder. The network will be operated separately from retail telcos such as Telstra and Optus.

Shares in Telstra were up 4%, or 13 cents, to $3.34.  The stock closed at $3.21 yesterday.

Mr Rudd said the broadband proposal would provide 37,000 jobs at the peak of construction, providing a major boost to the economy in the midst of a global recession.

The fibre-to-the-premise network will run to 90% of homes and businesses. The Government will make an initial investment of $4.7 billion in the company but intends to sell its interest within five years after the network is fully operational. The network will be funded from Aussie Infrastructure Bonds while private sector investment in the new company will be capped at 49%.

The remaining homes and businesses will be reached via wireless and satellite technologies offering speeds of 12 megabits per second.

The proposal goes much further than the Government had previously planned as fibre-optic cables will now run all the way from telephone exchanges to homes and businesses. It had previously planned to lay cables only from exchanges to cabinets at the end of street corners.

In a major blow to Telstra, Mr Rudd said it was time ”to bite the bullet” after years of neglect of the telecommunications sector.

”Years of failed policy have left Australia as a broadband backwater,” he said.

He described it as the ”single biggest infrastructure decision in Australia’s history”.

A report to the Government from an expert panel found none of the national bids ”offered value for money for Australian taxpayers”.

Telstra was dumped from the tender in early December after failing to meet a basic requirement, leaving Melbourne group Acacia, the SingTel-owned Optus, the Canadian telco Axia NetMedia, the Tasmanian Government and TransAct vying for the funding. The latter two made regional bids.

Telstra shares have fallen 22% since it was excluded from the tender.

”The investment by the Government creates an alternative to Telstra’s fixed-line network over time, effectively re-nationalising part of the fixed-line industry in Australia,” JPMorgan’s telecommunications analyst, Laurent Horrut, said today.

Mr Horrut said the new network would make Telstra’s copper-wire network obsolete within a five to 10-year period. ”In addition, the Government is reviewing all key regulatory conditions in the sector and that will create significant uncertainty for the company,” he said.

The Government plans to start construction in Tasmania around the middle of the year.

Facing the loss of its near-monopoly on fixed-line telecommunications, Telstra is expected to fight in the courts any attempt by the Government to force it to relinquish its grip.

Some have suggested the project could be delayed by five to 10 years by Telstra using legal action to prevent the access required to its copper-wire network to complete the project.

However, the Government today made clear it would change legislation to prevent Telstra from jeopardising the success of a national network.

Since it was dumped from the tender in early December, Telstra has been promoting its ”Plan B”, which includes plans to spend about $300 million increase speeds on its Melbourne cable network.

The alternative strategy entails shifting fixed-line customers onto its cable network and third-generation NextG mobile network.

Link to the original Article Here

Telstra can burst its rivals’ blisters

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

by Terry McCrann

TELSTRA has shown why wireless broadband is not good enough in place of a National (cable) Broadband Network. But also why its Next G wireless network might be good enough to stop anyone else’s NBN.

That’s unless the government was prepared to put in far more than its promised $4.7 billion to build the NBN. It arguably would have to put in at least double that, and quite possibly pay for the entire NBN.

Telstra yesterday was trumpeting it had the world’s fastest mobile broadband network, with peak network speeds up to a “blistering 21Mbps”.

The trumpeting was actually a self-parody of ‘advice’ to potential customers to read the fine print in any contract with Telstra.

Blistering peak speed of 21Mbps — going to an amazing 42Mbps later this year. But actual speeds of 550Kbps to 8Mbps. The 8 falls disappointingly enough far short of the 21/42; the 550 is a joke.

And even that’s only if you are in the capital cities and “selected regional areas”. Everywhere else it’s 550Kbps to just 3Mbps.

And Telstra also “offers” the “choice” of a cheaper 3.6Mbps speed. Which is actually 550Kbps to 1.5Mbps.

Telstra keeps boasting how much faster these speeds are compared with dial-up internet. That’s like saying how much better you car is compared with a Model-T Ford.

It’s just the technology. Wireless mobile simply can’t deliver sustained, real — as in, 21st century — broadband speeds.

You can only get pervasive, sustained 21Mbps, far less the already slightly obsolete 100Mbps, with fixed fibre-to-the-node cable.

So we have to get an FTTN? We will get an FTTN?

Actually, not necessarily. Telstra can cut a future FTTN off at the knees with aggressive marketing of its wireless mobile broadband and aggressive re-tooling of its existing (Foxtel) cable which goes past the key homes in Melbourne and Sydney.

The Optus-led bidder for the NBN will only proceed if the government bans an alternative network. And puts in the $4.7 billion, going on $10 billion.

While it might be able to ban a new competing NBN, it would find it impossible to stop Telstra ‘building’ a hybrid mobile-cable network.

In short, if Telstra plays hardball the NBN is dead. Unless the government lets Telstra build it, essentially on its terms. Or the government itself builds the mother of all white elephants.

 

Source: heraldsun.com.au
Original article here : http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25070484-36281,00.html